Porsche Macan I (95B)
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6vsPorsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne III
S 2.9 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed266 km/h165 mph
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lightest1,925 kg4,244 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range815 km507 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Most powerful440 hp328 kW
- Best power-to-weight218 hp/t162 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions213 g/km
- Largest trunk770 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 440hp328kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,925kg4,244lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 2,840kg6,261lb |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.0s99% target: 263 km/h / 164 mph Calculated | 68.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.6s Calculated | 17.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 218hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 815km507mi Calculated | 798km496mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,604cc220cu in | 2,894cc177cu in |
| Length | 4,699mm185in | 4,918mm194in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,696mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 770L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,710L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 216g/km | 213g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5,700-6,600 rpm | 1,800-5,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.6 s | 17.9 s |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW |
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 has 40 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 and Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 265 km/h 165 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 4.8 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5.2 s |
Although Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 and Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 815 km 507 mi |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 798 km 496 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.8 s | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW | 5.2 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 440 hp 328 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 815 km 507 mi | 798 km 496 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 216 g/km | 213 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 770 L 27.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 | Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 270 L more trunk volume
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























