Porsche Cayenne (955)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne (955) Turbo 4.5 V8vsPorsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne III
S 2.9 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Lightest2,020 kg4,453 lb
- Best power-to-weight218 hp/t162 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions213 g/km
- Best estimated range798 km496 mi
- Largest trunk770 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Porsche Cayenne (955) Turbo 4.5 V8
- Fastest top speed266 km/h165 mph
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 440hp328kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Gross weight | 3,080kg6,790lb | 2,840kg6,261lb |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 263 km/h / 164 mph Calculated | 68.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.9s Calculated | 17.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 185hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 218hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 637km396mi Calculated | 798km496mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,511cc275cu in | 2,894cc177cu in |
| Length | 4,782mm188in | 4,918mm194in |
| Width | 1,928mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,699mm67in | 1,696mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,855mm112in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | 1,647mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,662mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 770L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,770L | 1,710L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 378g/km | 213g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne (955) Turbo 4.5 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,250-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5,700-6,600 rpm | 1,800-5,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.9 s | 17.9 s |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW |
Porsche Cayenne (955) Turbo 4.5 V8 has 10 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 and Porsche Cayenne (955) Turbo 4.5 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 265 km/h 165 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 5.6 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5.2 s |
Although Porsche Cayenne (955) Turbo 4.5 V8 has more power, Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 and Porsche Cayenne (955) Turbo 4.5 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 and Porsche Cayenne (955) Turbo 4.5 V8: 6.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 637 km 396 mi |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 798 km 496 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 5.6 s | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW | 5.2 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 440 hp 328 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 637 km 396 mi | 798 km 496 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 378 g/km | 213 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 770 L 27.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne (955) Turbo 4.5 V8 | Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.47 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,121 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne (955) Turbo 4.5 V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Is 410 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 6.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
- Has 230 L more trunk volume
- Emits 165 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























