Porsche Cayenne III
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8vsPorsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Macan I (95B)
Turbo 3.6 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph
- Most powerful460 hp343 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight214 hp/t160 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk772 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6
- Lightest1,925 kg4,244 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions216 g/km
- Best estimated range815 km507 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460hp343kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 1,925kg4,244lb |
| Gross weight | 2,860kg6,305lb | 2,550kg5,622lb |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 64.9s99% target: 263 km/h / 164 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s | 16.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 789km491mi Calculated | 815km507mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 3,604cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,929mm194in | 4,699mm185in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,676mm66in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,682mm66in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,665mm66in | 1,651mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 772L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,708L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 260g/km | 216g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 16.6 s |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8 has 60 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 and Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 266 km/h 165 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 4.8 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 4.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 and Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 789 km 491 mi |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 815 km 507 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.8 s | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.8 s | 266 km/h 165 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp 343 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 266 km/h 165 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 789 km 491 mi | 815 km 507 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 260 g/km | 216 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 772 L 27.3 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8 | Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 272 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 44 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























