Porsche Cayenne II
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8vsPorsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne III
GTS 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed278 km/h173 mph
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score76/100
Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8
- Lightest2,145 kg4,729 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions260 g/km
- Best estimated range789 km491 mi
- Largest trunk772 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 460hp343kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,145kg4,729lb |
| Gross weight | 2,880kg6,349lb | 2,860kg6,305lb |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.0s99% target: 275 km/h / 171 mph Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 17.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,806cc293cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,846mm191in | 4,929mm194in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,676mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,682mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | 1,665mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 670L | 772L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 1,708L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | 260g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 17.9 s |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW |
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 has 40 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 270 km/h 168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 4.7 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 739 km 459 mi |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.7 s | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.8 s | 270 km/h 168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 460 hp 343 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 270 km/h 168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | 260 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | 772 L 27.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 | Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
- Has 102 L more trunk volume
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























