Porsche Cayenne II
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8vsPorsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne III
S 2.9 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Lightest2,020 kg4,453 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions213 g/km
- Best estimated range798 km496 mi
- Largest trunk770 L
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed278 km/h173 mph
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 440hp328kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Gross weight | 2,880kg6,349lb | 2,840kg6,261lb |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.0s99% target: 275 km/h / 171 mph Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 17.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 218hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | 798km496mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,806cc293cu in | 2,894cc177cu in |
| Length | 4,846mm191in | 4,918mm194in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,696mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 670L | 770L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 1,710L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | 213g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5,700-6,600 rpm | 1,800-5,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 17.8 s |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW |
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 has 60 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 and Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 265 km/h 165 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 4.7 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 and Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 739 km 459 mi |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 798 km 496 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.7 s | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW | 5.2 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 440 hp 328 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | 798 km 496 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | 213 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | 770 L 27.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 | Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 59 km (37 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
- Emits 57 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























