Renault Latitude
Car comparison
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCivsNissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Teana II
3.5i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range972 km604 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,581 kg3,486 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk488 L
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 326Nm240lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,581kg3,486lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 60.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.0s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 972km604mi Calculated | 686km426mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,998cc183cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,897mm193in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,483mm58in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,762mm109in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,565mm62in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,550mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 477L | 488L |
| Max trunk volume | 511L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi: Power / Torque
- Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 3,750 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.0 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 240 hp 179 kW |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 249 hp 186 kW |
Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V has 9 hp more than Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi and Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 326 Nm 240 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 1,581 kg 3,486 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.6 s |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V and Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi and Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 972 km 604 mi |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 686 km 426 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.6 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 249 hp 186 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 326 Nm 240 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 1,581 kg 3,486 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 972 km 604 mi | 686 km 426 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | 488 L 17.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi | Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi
- Has 124 Nm more
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 286 km (178 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 149 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 11 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























