Volkswagen Tiguan III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSIvsNissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Qashqai III (J12)
1.3 DIG-T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T
- Most powerful158 hp118 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lightest1,511 kg3,331 lb
- Best power-to-weight105 hp/t78 kW/t9.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.1 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score40/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 158hp118kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,616kg3,563lb | 1,511kg3,331lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 197 km/h / 122 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.1s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 56.0s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.6s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 859km534mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,539mm179in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,859mm73in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,676mm105in | 2,665mm105in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | 1,602mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 652L | 504L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,650L | 1,447L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI: Power / Torque
- Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.1 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 56.0 s | - |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.6 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 136 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 158 hp 118 kW |
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T has 8 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 1,616 kg 3,563 lb |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 1,511 kg 3,331 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 199 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 9.1 s |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 9.2 s |
Although Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 859 km 534 mi |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 158 hp 118 kW | 9.2 s | 199 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 158 hp 118 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.1 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,616 kg 3,563 lb | 1,511 kg 3,331 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 859 km 534 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI | Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 148 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 141 km (87 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























