Volkswagen Tiguan I
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan III
1.5 eTSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score48/100
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
- Lightest1,616 kg3,563 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range859 km534 mi
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,662kg3,664lb | 1,616kg3,563lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 91.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.2s Calculated | 56.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 168Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 719km447mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,427mm174in | 4,539mm179in |
| Width | 1,809mm71in | 1,859mm73in |
| Height | 1,683mm66in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,604mm103in | 2,676mm105in |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,582mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 652L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,650L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.2 s | 56.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI has 50 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI and Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 1,662 kg 3,664 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 1,616 kg 3,563 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 7.9 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI and Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 719 km 447 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,662 kg 3,664 lb | 1,616 kg 3,563 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 719 km 447 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
- Is 46 kg lighter
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 140 km (87 mi) more estimated range
- Has 182 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























