Volkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan III
1.5 eTSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,598 kg3,523 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score49/100
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range859 km534 mi
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,598kg3,523lb | 1,616kg3,563lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 91.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.3s Calculated | 56.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 753km468mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,426mm174in | 4,539mm179in |
| Width | 1,809mm71in | 1,859mm73in |
| Height | 1,703mm67in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,604mm103in | 2,676mm105in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,571mm62in | 1,582mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 652L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,650L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.3 s | 56.0 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 61 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI and Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 61 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,598 kg 3,523 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 1,616 kg 3,563 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI and Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 753 km 468 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,598 kg 3,523 lb | 1,616 kg 3,563 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 753 km 468 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Has 61 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 18 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 106 km (66 mi) more estimated range
- Has 182 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























