Car comparison

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVOvsNissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Formentor

2.0 TDI EVO

150 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2024
VS

Nissan Qashqai III (J12)

1.3 DIG-T

158 hp1332 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    203 km/h
    126 mph
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T

  • Most powerful
    158 hp
    118 kW
  • Lightest
    1,511 kg
    3,331 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    105 hp/t
    78 kW/t
    9.6 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Largest trunk
    504 L
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVONissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
Power
150hp112kW
158hp118kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,548kg3,413lb
1,511kg3,331lb
Gross weight
2,140kg4,718lb
1,985kg4,376lb
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
199 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
80.7s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
86.5s99% target: 197 km/h / 122 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
9.2s
0-200 km/h
72.8s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
962km597mi
Calculated
1,000km621mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,332cc81cu in
Length
4,450mm175in
4,425mm174in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,835mm72in
Height
1,528mm60in
1,625mm64in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,665mm105in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,596mm63in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,602mm63in
Trunk volume
420L
504L
Max trunk volume-
1,447L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVONissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-TPowerTorque
  • Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO3,000-4,200 rpm1,600-2,750 rpm4,450 rpm
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T5,500 rpm1,800-3,750 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVONissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
9.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
72.8 s
-
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
199 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
136 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
150 hp
112 kW
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
158 hp
118 kW

Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T has 8 hp more than Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
1,548 kg
3,413 lb
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
1,511 kg
3,331 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
203 km/h
126 mph
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
199 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO8.6 s
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T9.2 s

Although Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T has more power, Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
962 km
597 mi
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
1,000 km
621 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
150 hp
112 kW
8.6 s
203 km/h
126 mph
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
158 hp
118 kW
9.2 s
199 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
199 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
504 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
199 km/h
124 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.6 s
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
9.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVONissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
Power
150 hp
112 kW
158 hp
118 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
9.2 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
199 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,548 kg
3,413 lb
1,511 kg
3,331 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
504 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Range score
962 km
597 mi
1,000 km
621 mi
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
504 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVONissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO

  • Has 90 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Is 37 kg lighter
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 84 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI EVO
2.0 TDI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVOvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI
1.3 DIG-T
1.3 DIG-T
VS
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-TvsNissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
2.0 TDI EVO
1.5 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVOvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
1.3 DIG-T
35 TFSI
VS
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-TvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
2.0 TDI EVO
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVOvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.3 DIG-T
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-TvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDI EVO
GLA 200d
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVOvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d
1.3 DIG-T
1.5 TSI
VS
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-TvsCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
2.0 TDI EVO
2.0 TDI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVOvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI
2.0 TDI EVO
GLA 200d
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVOvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d
1.3 DIG-T
35 TDI
VS
NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-TvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
2.0 TDI EVO
1.5 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVOvsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO vs Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T - car comparison - FastVsFaster