Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016
Nismo 3.8 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 2014-2016
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful600 hp447 kW
- Highest torque652 Nm481 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight361 hp/t270 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range627 km390 mi
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | 652Nm481lb-ft | 652Nm481lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 36.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 38.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.7s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.4s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.6s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.0s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 361hp/t270kW/t164hp/1000 lb Calculated | 348hp/t259kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 393Nm/t263lb-ft/ton Calculated | 378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 627km390mi Calculated | 627km390mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,799cc232cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,680mm184in | 4,690mm185in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,370mm54in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,600mm63in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 105mm4in | 105mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 315L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 74L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 2014-2016: Power / Torque
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 2016-2019: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 6,800 rpm | 3,200-5,800 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 6,800 rpm | 3,600-5,600 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.4 s | 7.8 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 143 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 600 hp 447 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 2.7 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 2014-2016 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 2016-2019: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 361 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 627 km 390 mi |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 627 km 390 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 600 hp 447 kW | 2.7 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 600 hp 447 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 2014-2016 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.7 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | 361 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62014-2016 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V62016-2019 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.7 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 627 km 390 mi | 627 km 390 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 361 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 2014-2016 | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 2016-2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 2014-2016
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 2016-2019
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























