Aston Martin V12 Vantage
Car comparison
Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016
Nismo 3.8 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Most powerful600 hp447 kW
- Highest torque652 Nm481 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight348 hp/t259 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range627 km390 mi
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 573hp427kW | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 652Nm481lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.8s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 38.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.6s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 344hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated | 348hp/t259kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 544km338mi Calculated | 627km390mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,385mm173in | 4,690mm185in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,250mm49in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 105mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 315L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 343g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 6,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 3,600-5,600 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 45.9 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 10.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 210 km/h 130 mph | 229 km/h 143 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 600 hp 447 kW |
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 has 27 hp more than Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 3.9 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 544 km 338 mi |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 627 km 390 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW | 3.9 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 600 hp 447 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 573 hp 427 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 544 km 338 mi | 627 km 390 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 343 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12 | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 32 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 83 km (52 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























