Car comparison

Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Aston Martin V12 Vantage

S 6.0 V12

573 hp5935 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2016-2018
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2016-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Most powerful
    600 hp
    447 kW
  • Highest torque
    652 Nm
    481 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    348 hp/t
    259 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.0 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    627 km
    390 mi
  • Largest trunk
    315 L
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
573hp427kW
600hp447kW
Torque
620Nm457lb-ft
652Nm481lb-ft
Curb weight
1,665kg3,671lb
1,725kg3,803lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
57.8s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph
Calculated
38.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
10.6s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.7s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.6s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
344hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb
Calculated
348hp/t259kW/t158hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
544km338mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,935cc362cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,385mm173in
4,690mm185in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,250mm49in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,600mm102in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,570mm62in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
300L
315L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
80L
74L
CO2 emissions
343g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V126,750 rpm5,750 rpm7,000 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,600-5,600 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.7 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.9 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.6 s
7.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
45.9 s
-
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.6 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
210 km/h
130 mph
229 km/h
143 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
573 hp
427 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 has 27 hp more than Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12.

The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 27 hp (20 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
1,725 kg
3,803 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
330 km/h
205 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
344 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
348 hp/t
259 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
544 km
338 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
627 km
390 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
573 hp
427 kW
3.9 s
330 km/h
205 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
Power
573 hp
427 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,385 mm
172.6 in
Height
1,250 mm
49.2 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
Power
573 hp
427 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
3.9 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Aston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
344 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
348 hp/t
259 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
573 hp
427 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.9 s
2.8 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
Fuel consumption
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,385 mm
172.6 in
Height
1,250 mm
49.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
544 km
338 mi
627 km
390 mi
CO2 score
343 g/km
-
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
344 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
348 hp/t
259 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
Consumption14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.72 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.40 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,859 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12

  • Is 60 kg lighter
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Has 27 hp more
  • Has 32 Nm more
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 83 km (52 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Aston Martin V12 Vantage S 6.0 V12 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster