Ferrari 458 Speciale
Car comparison
Ferrari 458 Speciale 4.5 V8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010
Nismo 3.8 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari 458 Speciale 4.5 V8
- Fastest top speed340 km/h211 mph Unrestricted325 km/h202 mph Restricted
- Most powerful605 hp451 kW
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight434 hp/t323 kW/t2.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range729 km453 mi
- Best economy score75/100
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Highest torque652 Nm481 lb-ft
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 605hp451kW | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 652Nm481lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,395kg3,075lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 40.3s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated | 36.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 2.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.7s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 2.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 10.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 434hp/t323kW/t197hp/1000 lb Calculated | 361hp/t270kW/t164hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated | 393Nm/t263lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 729km453mi Calculated | 627km390mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,497cc274cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,571mm180in | 4,680mm184in |
| Width | 1,951mm77in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,203mm47in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,600mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,632mm64in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 105mm4in |
| Trunk volume | - | 315L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 275g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 458 Speciale 4.5 V8: Power / Torque
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | 9,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 9,250 rpm |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 3,200-5,800 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 2.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 25.6 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.7 s | 8.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 236 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | 605 hp 451 kW |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 600 hp 447 kW |
Ferrari 458 Speciale 4.5 V8 has 5 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Ferrari 458 Speciale 4.5 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | 3.0 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 2.7 s |
Although Ferrari 458 Speciale 4.5 V8 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Ferrari 458 Speciale 4.5 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | 434 hp/t 323 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 361 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | 729 km 453 mi |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 627 km 390 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | 605 hp 451 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 600 hp 447 kW | 2.7 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | 434 hp/t 323 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | 361 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari458 Speciale4.5 V8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 605 hp 451 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 2.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 729 km 453 mi | 627 km 390 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 275 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 434 hp/t 323 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 361 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 458 Speciale 4.5 V8 | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 458 Speciale 4.5 V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 72 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 102 km (63 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6
- Has 112 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























