Car comparison

Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Aston Martin Vanquish II

6.0 V12

577 hp5935 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2012-2018
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2014-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.7 s
  • Most powerful
    600 hp
    447 kW
  • Highest torque
    652 Nm
    481 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    361 hp/t
    270 kW/t
    2.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.0 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    627 km
    390 mi
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
577hp430kW
600hp447kW
Torque
630Nm465lb-ft
652Nm481lb-ft
Curb weight
1,739kg3,834lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
323 km/h
201 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
57.6s99% target: 320 km/h / 199 mph
Calculated
36.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
2.7s
0-200 km/h
10.7s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
2.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.5s
Calculated
10.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
332hp/t247kW/t151hp/1000 lb
Calculated
361hp/t270kW/t164hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
362Nm/t242lb-ft/ton
Calculated
393Nm/t263lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
609km379mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,935cc362cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,728mm186in
4,680mm184in
Width
1,912mm75in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,294mm51in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,740mm108in
2,780mm109in
Front track-
1,600mm63in
Rear track-
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume-
315L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
78L
74L
CO2 emissions
298g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V126,650 rpm5,500 rpm6,900 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,200-5,800 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
2.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
2.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.7 s
7.4 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
71.9 s
-
Top speed
323 km/h
201 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
6.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
8.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.5 s
10.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
208 km/h
129 mph
233 km/h
145 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
577 hp
430 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 has 23 hp more than Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12.

The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6: 23 hp (17 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
1,739 kg
3,834 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
323 km/h
201 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V123.8 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
332 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
361 hp/t
270 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
609 km
379 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
627 km
390 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
577 hp
430 kW
3.8 s
323 km/h
201 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.7 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
Power
577 hp
430 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
323 km/h
201 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,294 mm
50.9 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.7 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,680 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
Power
577 hp
430 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
323 km/h
201 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.7 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
3.8 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
332 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
361 hp/t
270 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
577 hp
430 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
2.7 s
Top speed
323 km/h
201 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,739 kg
3,834 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,294 mm
50.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,680 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
609 km
379 mi
627 km
390 mi
CO2 score
298 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
332 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
361 hp/t
270 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6
Consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.40 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.05 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,360 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12

  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Has 23 hp more
  • Has 22 Nm more
  • Is 79 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.0 V12
6.0 V12
VS
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12vsAston MartinV12 Vanquish S6.0 V12
Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
6.0 V12
6.0 V12
VS
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12vsAston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
6.0 V12
5.2 V12
VS
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12vsAston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
6.0 V12
S 6.0 V12
VS
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12vsAston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
Nismo 3.8 V6
FINAL EDITION GT 6.2 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLS AMG Coupe (C197)FINAL EDITION GT 6.2 V8
6.0 V12
5.2 V12
VS
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12vsAston MartinDB115.2 V12
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8
6.0 V12
6.0 V12
VS
Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12vsAston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12
Nismo 3.8 V6
4.5 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsFerrari458 Speciale4.5 V8
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster