Car comparison

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0vsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Hatch (F56)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2014-2018
VS

Mini Paceman (R61)

Cooper S 1.6

190 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2014-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    233 km/h
    145 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,175 kg
    2,590 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    122 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    125 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    815 km
    506 mi
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
260Nm192lb-ft
Curb weight
1,175kg2,590lb
1,305kg2,877lb
Gross weight
1,655kg3,649lb
1,775kg3,913lb
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
69.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
81.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
26.9s
Calculated
37.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
815km506mi
Calculated
783km487mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
3,850mm152in
4,114mm162in
Width
1,727mm68in
1,786mm70in
Height
1,414mm56in
1,518mm60in
Wheelbase
2,495mm98in
2,595mm102in
Front track
1,485mm58in
1,531mm60in
Rear track
1,485mm58in
1,558mm61in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
211L
330L
Max trunk volume-
1,080L
Doors
3
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
44L
47L
CO2 emissions
125g/km
139g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6PowerTorque
  • Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.04,700-6,000 rpm1,250-4,750 rpm6,250 rpm
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.65,500-6,500 rpm1,700-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.9 s
37.8 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
260 Nm
192 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
1,305 kg
2,877 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
233 km/h
145 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.06.7 s
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.67.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
815 km
506 mi
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
783 km
487 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
6.7 s
233 km/h
145 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,850 mm
151.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
6.7 s
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
260 Nm
192 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.4 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
1,305 kg
2,877 lb
Fuel consumption
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,850 mm
151.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in
Range score
815 km
506 mi
783 km
487 mi
CO2 score
125 g/km
139 g/km
Trunk score
211 L
7.5 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.45 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.21 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used810 L214 US gal178 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,418 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 130 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 31 km (20 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

  • Has 119 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsVolkswagenGolf VII (3-DOOR)GTD 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsAUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 vs Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster