Car comparison

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0vsMini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Hatch (F65)

Cooper S 2.0

204 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2024-present
VS

Mini Hatch (F56)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2014-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    242 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    275 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    70/100

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Lightest
    1,175 kg
    2,590 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    122 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    815 km
    506 mi
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
204hp152kW
192hp143kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,355kg2,987lb
1,175kg2,590lb
Gross weight
1,865kg4,112lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
79.3s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
69.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
26.4s
Calculated
26.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
647km402mi
Calculated
815km506mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,036mm159in
3,850mm152in
Width
1,744mm69in
1,727mm68in
Height
1,464mm58in
1,414mm56in
Wheelbase
2,567mm101in
2,495mm98in
Front track-
1,485mm58in
Rear track-
1,485mm58in
Ground clearance-
124mm5in
Trunk volume
275L
211L
Max trunk volume
925L
-
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
44L
44L
CO2 emissions-
125g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0PowerTorque
  • Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.05,000-6,500 rpm1,450-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.04,700-6,000 rpm1,250-4,750 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.4 s
26.9 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
204 hp
152 kW
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 has 12 hp more than Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
1,355 kg
2,987 lb
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
1,175 kg
2,590 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
242 km/h
150 mph
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
233 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.06.8 s
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.06.7 s

Although Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 has more power, Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
647 km
402 mi
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
815 km
506 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
204 hp
152 kW
6.8 s
242 km/h
150 mph
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
6.7 s
233 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Length
4,036 mm
158.9 in
Height
1,464 mm
57.6 in
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,850 mm
151.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.8 s
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
204 hp
152 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
6.7 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,355 kg
2,987 lb
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Length
4,036 mm
158.9 in
Height
1,464 mm
57.6 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,850 mm
151.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
Range score
647 km
402 mi
815 km
506 mi
CO2 score
-
125 g/km
Trunk score
275 L
9.7 cu ft
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 64 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0

  • Is 180 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 168 km (104 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper C 1.5
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5
Cooper S 2.0
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniElectric (J01)JCW 54.2 kWh
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0vsVolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20242.0 TSI
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 vs Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster