Mini Hatch (F66)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0vsMini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F65)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score90/100
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk275 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,355kg2,987lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,865kg4,112lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.4s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 79.3s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 647km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,876mm153in | 4,036mm159in |
| Width | 1,744mm69in | 1,744mm69in |
| Height | 1,432mm56in | 1,464mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,567mm101in |
| Trunk volume | 210L | 275L |
| Max trunk volume | 725L | 925L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 44L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.6 s |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.6 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.8 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 647 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0 | Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























