AUDI A3 (8V)
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDIvsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Paceman (R61)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,285 kg2,833 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions108 g/km
- Best estimated range1,220 km758 mi
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score67/100
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,285kg2,833lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 37.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,220km758mi Calculated | 783km487mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,237mm167in | 4,114mm162in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,786mm70in |
| Height | 1,421mm56in | 1,518mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,601mm102in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,100L | 1,080L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 108g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 37.8 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has 6 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 7.3 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.4 s |
Although Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has more power, AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,220 km 758 mi |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 783 km 487 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,220 km 758 mi | 783 km 487 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 108 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI | Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.17 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,076 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 436 km (271 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
- Emits 31 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























