Mini Hatch (F56)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0vsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Paceman (R61)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,160 kg2,557 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions136 g/km
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score91/100
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range783 km487 mi
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best practicality score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,160kg2,557lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.8s Calculated | 37.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 759km471mi Calculated | 783km487mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 3,850mm152in | 4,114mm162in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,786mm70in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,518mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,485mm58in | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 211L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,080L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.8 s | 37.8 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,160 kg 2,557 lb |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 759 km 471 mi |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 783 km 487 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,160 kg 2,557 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 759 km 471 mi | 783 km 487 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 | Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 25 km (15 mi) more estimated range
- Has 119 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























