Car comparison

Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5vsMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (U25)

C 1.5

156 hp1499 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Mitsubishi ASX II

1.3 Turbo

158 hp1333 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

  • Most powerful
    158 hp
    118 kW
  • Highest torque
    270 Nm
    199 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,345 kg
    2,965 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    117 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    536 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    212 km/h
    132 mph
  • Best estimated range
    871 km
    541 mi
  • Best performance score
    43/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
156hp116kW
158hp118kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,545kg3,406lb
1,345kg2,965lb
Gross weight
2,095kg4,619lb
1,834kg4,043lb
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
87.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
76.5s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
49.8s
Calculated
63.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
871km541mi
Calculated
814km506mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,499cc91cu in
1,333cc81cu in
Length
4,444mm175in
4,227mm166in
Width
1,843mm73in
1,797mm71in
Height
1,661mm65in
1,585mm62in
Wheelbase
2,692mm106in
2,639mm104in
Front track-
1,560mm61in
Rear track-
1,547mm61in
Ground clearance-
174mm7in
Trunk volume
450L
536L
Max trunk volume
1,450L
1,275L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
54L
48L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 TurboPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.54,700-6,500 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,750 rpm
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo5,500 rpm1,800-3,750 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
49.8 s
63.9 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
156 hp
116 kW
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
158 hp
118 kW

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo has 2 hp more than Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 and Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
1,345 kg
2,965 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
212 km/h
132 mph
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.58.3 s
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo8.5 s

Although Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo has more power, Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 and Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
871 km
541 mi
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
814 km
506 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
156 hp
116 kW
8.3 s
212 km/h
132 mph
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
158 hp
118 kW
8.5 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
Power
156 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,444 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,227 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
Power
156 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.3 s
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
156 hp
116 kW
158 hp
118 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
1,345 kg
2,965 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,444 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,227 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
Range score
871 km
541 mi
814 km
506 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (U25) C 1.5Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 57 km (36 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 200 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 86 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 1.5
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
C 1.5
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1.3 Turbo
1.5 VGT
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
C 1.5
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
1.3 Turbo
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
C 1.5
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
C 1.5
GLA 250e
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e
1.3 Turbo
35 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
C 1.5
1.5 TSI
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5vsSeatAronaFacelift 20211.5 TSI
1.3 Turbo
C 1.5
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 vs Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster