Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5vsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 250e
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
GLA 250e
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.4 L/100 km168.0 mpg US201.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range2,500 km1,553 mi
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score100/100
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight101 hp/t75 kW/t9.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 81.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.8s Calculated | 49.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 1.4L/100 km168mpg US201.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 871km541mi Calculated | 2,500km1,553mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,444mm175in | 4,412mm174in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,609mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,583mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 385L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,385L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 35L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 4,700-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.8 s | 49.8 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 163 hp 122 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e has 7 hp more than Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 8.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e and Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 1.4 L/100 km 168.0 mpg US 201.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e and Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: 4.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 871 km 541 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 2,500 km 1,553 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 163 hp 122 kW | 7.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e |
| 1.4 L/100 km 168.0 mpg US 201.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 1.4 L/100 km 168.0 mpg US 201.8 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 1.4 L/100 km 168.0 mpg US 201.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 1.4 L/100 km 168.0 mpg US 201.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 871 km 541 mi | 2,500 km 1,553 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 1.4 L/100 km168 mpg US201.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 2.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 3.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 210 L55 US gal46 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 367.50 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250e
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1,629 km (1,012 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























