Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5vsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
GLA 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight101 hp/t75 kW/t9.9 kg/hp
- Best estimated range871 km541 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.5s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 88.8s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.8s Calculated | 58.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 871km541mi Calculated | 741km461mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,444mm175in | 4,412mm174in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 427L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,422L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 43L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 4,700-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 3,400-4,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.8 s | 58.9 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d and Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 8.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 871 km 541 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 741 km 461 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 871 km 541 mi | 741 km 461 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 130 km (81 mi) more estimated range
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























