Car comparison

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechvsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)

1.6 PureTech

181 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2021
VS

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,109 km
    689 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
181hp135kW
190hp142kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,429kg3,150lb
1,510kg3,329lb
Gross weight
1,970kg4,343lb
2,105kg4,641lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
83.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
80.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
38.0s
Calculated
38.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
679km422mi
Calculated
1,109km689mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,447mm175in
4,299mm169in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,822mm72in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,557mm61in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,601mm63in
1,563mm62in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
219mm9in
165mm6in
Trunk volume
520L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,482L
1,390L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
53L
51L
CO2 emissions-
122g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0PowerTorque
  • Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech5,500 rpm1,750 rpm5,750 rpm
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.0 s
38.3 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
181 hp
135 kW
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 has 9 hp more than Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech.

The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,510 kg
3,329 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
222 km/h
138 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech8.0 s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.07.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 3.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
679 km
422 mi
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,109 km
689 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
181 hp
135 kW
8.0 s
222 km/h
138 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,447 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
8.0 s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
181 hp
135 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
7.9 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,447 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Range score
679 km
422 mi
1,109 km
689 mi
CO2 score
-
122 g/km
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePeugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km8.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi12.96 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal690 L182 US gal152 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year1,208 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech

  • Is 81 kg lighter
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 70 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 429 km (267 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 PureTech
1.2 PureTech
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
1.6 PureTech
20d
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
1.6 PureTech
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Cooper SD 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
1.6 PureTech
GLB 220d
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
1.6 PureTech
1.2
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsPeugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2
Cooper SD 2.0
40 TDI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
1.6 PureTech
330TSI
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech vs Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster