Mini Clubman (R55)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6vsSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,296 km805 mi
- Largest trunk422 L
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 260Nm192lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,205kg2,657lb | 1,515kg3,340lb |
| Gross weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 80.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 36.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 1,296km805mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 3,958mm156in | 4,666mm184in |
| Width | 1,683mm66in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,432mm56in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,547mm100in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,453mm57in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 422L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | 1,354L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 36.7 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 has 14 hp more than Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.5 s |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 847 km 527 mi |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,296 km 805 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.5 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 1,296 km 805 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 422 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 | Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 310 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 449 km (279 mi) more estimated range
- Has 162 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























