Car comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsMini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012
VS

Mini Clubman (R55)

Cooper S 1.6

184 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2010-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    153 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    137 g/km
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    909 km
    565 mi
  • Largest trunk
    422 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
Power
200hp149kW
184hp137kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
260Nm192lb-ft
Curb weight
1,515kg3,340lb
1,205kg2,657lb
Gross weight
2,075kg4,575lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
To 99% top speed
71.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
65.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
29.8s
Calculated
29.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
909km565mi
Calculated
847km527mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,666mm184in
3,958mm156in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,683mm66in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,432mm56in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,547mm100in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,453mm57in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,461mm58in
Ground clearance-
135mm5in
Trunk volume
422L
260L
Max trunk volume
1,354L
930L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
50L
CO2 emissions
179g/km
137g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIMini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6PowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.65,500 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.8 s
29.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
184 hp
137 kW

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 16 hp more than Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
260 Nm
192 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,515 kg
3,340 lb
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
1,205 kg
2,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
227 km/h
141 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.6 s
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.67.5 s

Although Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has more power, Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
909 km
565 mi
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
847 km
527 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.6 s
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
184 hp
137 kW
7.5 s
227 km/h
141 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
3,958 mm
155.8 in
Height
1,432 mm
56.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.6 s
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
Power
200 hp
149 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
260 Nm
192 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Lightness
1,515 kg
3,340 lb
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
3,958 mm
155.8 in
Height
1,432 mm
56.4 in
Range score
909 km
565 mi
847 km
527 mi
CO2 score
179 g/km
137 g/km
Trunk score
422 L
14.9 cu ft
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIMini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Has 16 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 62 km (38 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 162 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6

  • Is 310 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 42 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
2.0d
VS
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6vsRenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6vsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6vsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
2.4 i-VTEC
VS
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6vsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6vsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6vsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI
Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI vs Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster