Car comparison

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0vsVolvo V90 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Clubman (F54)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2018-2019
VS

Volvo V90

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    127 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0VolvoV902.0 T4
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,860kg4,101lb
Gross weight
2,085kg4,597lb
-
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
68.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
86.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
32.4s
Calculated
41.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
797km495mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,253mm167in
4,936mm194in
Width
1,800mm71in
1,879mm74in
Height
1,441mm57in
1,475mm58in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,941mm116in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,928mm76in
Rear track
1,561mm61in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
141mm6in
153mm6in
Trunk volume
360L
560L
Max trunk volume
1,250L
1,526L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
48L
55L
CO2 emissions
127g/km
160g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0Volvo V90 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoV902.0 T45,000 rpm1,620-4,020 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0VolvoV902.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.4 s
41.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
VolvoV902.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
VolvoV902.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
VolvoV902.0 T4
1,860 kg
4,101 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
222 km/h
138 mph
VolvoV902.0 T4
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.07.4 s
VolvoV902.0 T48.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolvoV902.0 T4
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
VolvoV902.0 T4
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
1,000 km
621 mi
VolvoV902.0 T4
797 km
495 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
222 km/h
138 mph
VolvoV902.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
8.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
VolvoV902.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,936 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolvoV902.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
7.4 s
VolvoV902.0 T4
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolvoV902.0 T4
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0VolvoV902.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
8.9 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,860 kg
4,101 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,936 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
797 km
495 mi
CO2 score
127 g/km
160 g/km
Trunk score
360 L
12.7 cu ft
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0Volvo V90 2.0 T4
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 350 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 203 km (126 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 33 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Volvo V90 2.0 T4

  • Has 200 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 T4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
20d
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
Cooper SD 2.0
520d
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d
2.0 T4
2.0 Blue dCi
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsRenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi
Cooper SD 2.0
320d
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsBMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d
Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI
2.0 T4
1.6
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsSubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6
Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsVolkswagenGolf VII AlltrackFacelift 20172.0 TDI
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 vs Volvo V90 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster