Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 2.0 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,309 kg2,886 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,309kg2,886lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 2,085kg4,597lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 68.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.5s Calculated | 32.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,549mm179in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,470L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 127g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.5 s | 32.4 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 1,309 kg 2,886 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,309 kg 2,886 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 127 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Is 201 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 227 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 40 Nm more
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 194 km (120 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























