Car comparison

Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013 2.0 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2015
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

2.0d

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,405 kg
    3,097 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    101 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    117 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,091 km
    678 mi
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,562kg3,444lb
1,405kg3,097lb
Gross weight
2,125kg4,685lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
80.3s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
68.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
29.4s
Calculated
30.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
750km466mi
Calculated
1,091km678mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,833mm190in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,511mm59in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,761mm109in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,517mm60in
1,561mm61in
Ground clearance-
141mm6in
Trunk volume
633L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,865L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
48L
CO2 emissions
180g/km
117g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSIMini Clubman (F54) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI-1,700-5,000 rpm5,250 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.4 s
30.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
1,562 kg
3,444 lb
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,405 kg
3,097 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
238 km/h
148 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI7.8 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d7.4 s

Although Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI has more power, Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
750 km
466 mi
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,091 km
678 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
238 km/h
148 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.4 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,562 kg
3,444 lb
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
750 km
466 mi
1,091 km
678 mi
CO2 score
180 g/km
117 g/km
Trunk score
633 L
22.4 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSIMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km7.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi12.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal660 L174 US gal145 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,155 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 273 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 157 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 341 km (212 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 63 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb II Combi 2.0 TSI
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
2.0d
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
1.8 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20141.8 TFSI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
CLS 250 BlueTEC
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)Facelift 2014CLS 250 BlueTEC
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI
2.0d
1.8 TFSI ultra
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI vs Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster