Car comparison

Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013 2.0 TSIvsSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2015
VS

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Lightest
    1,515 kg
    3,340 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    132 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.6 L/100 km
    22.2 mpg US
    26.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    179 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    909 km
    565 mi
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    633 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSISeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,562kg3,444lb
1,515kg3,340lb
Gross weight
2,125kg4,685lb
2,075kg4,575lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
71.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
29.4s
Calculated
29.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
750km466mi
Calculated
909km565mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,833mm190in
4,666mm184in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,772mm70in
Height
1,511mm59in
1,454mm57in
Wheelbase
2,761mm109in
2,642mm104in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,522mm60in
Rear track
1,517mm60in
1,523mm60in
Trunk volume
633L
422L
Max trunk volume
1,865L
1,354L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
70L
CO2 emissions
180g/km
179g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSISeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI-1,700-5,000 rpm5,250 rpm
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSISeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.4 s
29.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
1,562 kg
3,444 lb
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,515 kg
3,340 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
238 km/h
148 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI7.8 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
750 km
466 mi
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
909 km
565 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
238 km/h
148 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.6 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSI
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSISeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.6 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,562 kg
3,444 lb
1,515 kg
3,340 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Range score
750 km
466 mi
909 km
565 mi
CO2 score
180 g/km
179 g/km
Trunk score
633 L
22.4 cu ft
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSISeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI

  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 211 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Is 47 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 1 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb II Combi 2.0 TSI
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
1.8 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20141.8 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
CLS 250 BlueTEC
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)Facelift 2014CLS 250 BlueTEC
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI vs Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster