Mini Clubman (F54)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0dvsSeat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon X-Perience
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions117 g/km
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score95/100
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Best estimated range1,122 km697 mi
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,529kg3,371lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.8s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,091km678mi Calculated | 1,122km697mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,253mm167in | 4,543mm179in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,441mm57in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,503mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,250L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 117g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.8 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d has 6 hp more than Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 7.4 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 7.1 s |
Although Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d has more power, Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 1,091 km 678 mi |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,122 km 697 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.1 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,091 km 678 mi | 1,122 km 697 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 117 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d | Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 124 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 32 km (20 mi) more estimated range
- Has 227 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























