AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultravsMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions117 g/km
- Best estimated range1,091 km678 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score95/100
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 68.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.5s Calculated | 30.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,083km673mi Calculated | 1,091km678mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,943mm195in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,874mm74in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,912mm115in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,627mm64in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,680L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | 117g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 4,200-6,200 rpm | 1,400-4,100 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.5 s | 30.8 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 8.2 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 1,083 km 673 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 1,091 km 678 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.2 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,083 km 673 mi | 1,091 km 678 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | 117 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra | Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 205 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























