Mini Clubman (F54)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0dvsSeat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon X-Perience
1.8 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions117 g/km
- Best estimated range1,091 km678 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score95/100
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,486kg3,276lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 65.7s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.8s Calculated | 31.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,091km678mi Calculated | 846km526mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,253mm167in | 4,543mm179in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,441mm57in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,503mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,250L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 117g/km | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.8 s | 31.7 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d has 10 hp more than Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 7.4 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 7.2 s |
Although Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d has more power, Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 1,091 km 678 mi |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 846 km 526 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.2 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,091 km 678 mi | 846 km 526 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 117 g/km | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d | Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 81 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 245 km (152 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 33 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 227 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























