Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250vsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Roadster (R59)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Lightest1,185 kg2,612 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk240 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Best overall score47/100
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,185kg2,612lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 822km511mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,796cc110cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 3,734mm147in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 240L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: Power / Torque
- Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,730-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 has 20 hp more than Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.5 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 and Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 822 km 511 mi |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.5 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 822 km 511 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 | Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























