Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R170)
SLK 200 Kompressor
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Largest trunk225 L
- Best overall score44/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score29/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,395kg3,075lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 83.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 32.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | 576km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,796cc110cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 3,995mm157in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,715mm68in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,485mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 145L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | 348L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 53L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 5,250 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,800 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 32.5 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor has 8 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 7.7 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor has more power, Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 882 km 548 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 576 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | 576 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 306 km (190 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























