Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8vsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)

SLK 200 1.8

184 hp1796 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2011-2015
VS

Mini Roadster (R59)

Cooper S 1.6

184 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedRoadster2012-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    153 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    153 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    240 L
  • Best practicality score
    30/100

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    184 hp
    137 kW
  • Highest torque
    270 Nm
    199 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    882 km
    548 mi
  • Best overall score
    44/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184hp137kW
184hp137kW
Torque
270Nm199lb-ft
260Nm192lb-ft
Curb weight
1,395kg3,075lb
1,205kg2,657lb
Gross weight
1,750kg3,858lb
1,495kg3,296lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
86.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
74.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
29.2s
Calculated
33.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
882km548mi
Calculated
758km471mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,796cc110cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,134mm163in
3,734mm147in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,683mm66in
Height
1,301mm51in
1,390mm55in
Wheelbase
2,430mm96in
2,467mm97in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,453mm57in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,461mm58in
Ground clearance-
134mm5in
Trunk volume
225L
240L
Max trunk volume
335L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
60L
50L
CO2 emissions
158g/km
153g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: Power / Torque
  • Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.85,250 rpm1,800-4,600 rpm5,500 rpm
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.65,500 rpm1,730-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.2 s
33.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
184 hp
137 kW
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
184 hp
137 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
260 Nm
192 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
1,395 kg
3,075 lb
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
1,205 kg
2,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
240 km/h
149 mph
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.87.3 s
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.67.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
882 km
548 mi
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
758 km
471 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
184 hp
137 kW
7.3 s
240 km/h
149 mph
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
184 hp
137 kW
7.2 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
225 L
7.9 cu ft
Length
4,134 mm
162.8 in
Height
1,301 mm
51.2 in
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
240 L
8.5 cu ft
Length
3,734 mm
147.0 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.3 s
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
260 Nm
192 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.2 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,395 kg
3,075 lb
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
225 L
7.9 cu ft
Length
4,134 mm
162.8 in
Height
1,301 mm
51.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
240 L
8.5 cu ft
Length
3,734 mm
147.0 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
Range score
882 km
548 mi
758 km
471 mi
CO2 score
158 g/km
153 g/km
Trunk score
225 L
7.9 cu ft
240 L
8.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km11.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi18.59 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal990 L262 US gal218 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,733 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 125 km (78 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6

  • Is 190 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

SLK 200 1.8
SLK 230 Kompressor
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
Cooper S 1.6
SLK 200 1.8
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
SLK 200 1.8
SLK 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008SLK 350 V6
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI ultra
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsAUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra
SLK 200 1.8
SLK 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TFSI
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
SLK 200 1.8
AMG SLK 32 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TFSI
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
SLK 200 1.8
Cooper S 1.6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8vsMiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 1.6
S Cup 1.8
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8
Cooper S 1.6
20i
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsBMWZ4 (G29)20i
Cooper S 1.6
1.8 T
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsAUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 vs Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster