AUDI TT Roadster (8S)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultravsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Roadster (R59)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,163 km723 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.2s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 33.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,163km723mi Calculated | 758km471mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,177mm164in | 3,734mm147in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,355mm53in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,505mm99in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 240L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 114g/km | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra: Power / Torque
- Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,730-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 33.9 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 7.3 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra and Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 1,163 km 723 mi |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 758 km 471 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,163 km 723 mi | 758 km 471 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 114 g/km | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra | Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 405 km (252 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
- Emits 39 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























