AUDI TT Roadster (8S)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDIvsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Roadster (R59)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions147 g/km
- Best estimated range982 km610 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,785kg3,935lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 33.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 982km610mi Calculated | 758km471mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,177mm164in | 3,734mm147in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,355mm53in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,505mm99in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 240L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 147g/km | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,730-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 33.9 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 7.0 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI and Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI and Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 982 km 610 mi |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 758 km 471 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 982 km 610 mi | 758 km 471 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 147 g/km | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI | Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 225 km (140 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























