Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
SLK 200 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Largest trunk225 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score29/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful354 hp264 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight249 hp/t186 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354hp264kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.8s Calculated | 29.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 536km333mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,199cc195cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,010mm158in | 4,134mm163in |
| Width | 1,715mm68in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,269mm50in | 1,301mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | 1,488mm59in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,477mm58in | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 145L | 225L |
| Max trunk volume | 348L | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 158g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 6,100 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 5,250 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.8 s | 29.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 has 170 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: 170 hp (127 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: 2.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: 4.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 536 km 333 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp 264 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 536 km 333 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 158 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6
- Has 170 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 117 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 347 km (215 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























