Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8vsAUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8S)
2.0 TDI ultra
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,163 km723 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,395kg3,075lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 88.2s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | 1,163km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,796cc110cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 4,177mm164in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,355mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,552mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 280L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | 114g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 5,250 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 7.3 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 7.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 882 km 548 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 1,163 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | 1,163 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | 114 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 | AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 280 km (174 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 44 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























