Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8vsAUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8S)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions147 g/km
- Best estimated range982 km610 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,395kg3,075lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,785kg3,935lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 82.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | 982km610mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,796cc110cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 4,177mm164in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,355mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,552mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 280L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | 147g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 5,250 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 7.3 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 882 km 548 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 982 km 610 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8 | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | 982 km 610 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | 147 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 | AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























