BMW Z3 (E36/7)
Car comparison
BMW Z3 (E36/7) 2.8vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R170)
SLK 200 Kompressor
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z3 (E36/7) 2.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk165 L
- Best overall score45/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score27/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,285kg2,833lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 83.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.3s Calculated | 32.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 576km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,793cc170cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,050mm159in | 3,995mm157in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,715mm68in |
| Height | 1,293mm51in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,446mm96in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,413mm56in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,494mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 165L | 145L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 348L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 53L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z3 (E36/7) 2.8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,800 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.3 s | 32.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 | 192 hp 143 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 192 hp 143 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 | 6.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z3 (E36/7) 2.8 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ3 (E36/7)2.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 576 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z3 (E36/7) 2.8
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























