Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R170)
SLK 200 Kompressor
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t130 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Largest trunk265 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 2,230kg4,916lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 83.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 32.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km432mi Calculated | 576km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,973cc303cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,499mm177in | 3,995mm157in |
| Width | 1,812mm71in | 1,715mm68in |
| Height | 1,303mm51in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,515mm99in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,485mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 265L | 145L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 348L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 53L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,800 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 32.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8 has 128 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8: 128 hp (95 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 696 km 432 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 576 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 432 mi | 576 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 265 L 9.4 cu ft | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8 | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8
- Has 128 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 34 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 km (74 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor
- Is 585 kg lighter
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























