Skoda Kodiaq II
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
EQE 300 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Lightest1,891 kg4,169 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk910 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,891kg4,169lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | 3,055kg6,735lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 674km419mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,761mm187in | 4,863mm191in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,940mm76in |
| Height | 1,663mm65in | 1,685mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,650mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 194mm8in | 181mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 910L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,105L | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 265 hp 198 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 1,891 kg 4,169 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.3 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 265 hp 198 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,891 kg 4,169 lb | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 674 km 419 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 910 L 32.1 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
- Is 479 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 390 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
- Has 150 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























