Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
C 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful457 hp341 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight276 hp/t206 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range889 km552 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 457hp341kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 39.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 68.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 29.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20.9L/100 km11.3mpg US13.5mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 493km306mi Calculated | 889km552mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 1,993cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,725mm186in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,765mm109in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,568mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,613mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 29.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 457 hp 341 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8 has 294 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8: 294 hp (219 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d: 3.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8: 8.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 493 km 306 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 889 km 552 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 457 hp 341 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 |
| 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 457 hp 341 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 493 km 306 mi | 889 km 552 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.45 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.74 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,518 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8
- Has 294 hp more
- Has 220 Nm more
- Is 3.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 177 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Uses 8.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 396 km (246 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























