Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997
AMG C 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful457 hp341 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight276 hp/t206 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score81/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range530 km329 mi
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 457hp341kW | 347hp259kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 39.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20.9L/100 km11.3mpg US13.5mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 493km306mi Calculated | 530km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,725mm186in | 4,516mm178in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,723mm68in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,387mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,765mm109in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,568mm62in | 1,509mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,483mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 457 hp 341 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8 has 110 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8: 110 hp (82 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 493 km 306 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 457 hp 341 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 |
| 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 457 hp 341 kW | 347 hp 259 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 493 km 306 mi | 530 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.45 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.74 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,518 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 V8
- Has 110 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 55 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























