Car comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIvsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2023
VS

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain

C 200

204 hp1496 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    233 km/h
    145 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,468 km
    912 mi
  • Largest trunk
    660 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Power
200hp149kW
204hp152kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,731kg3,816lb
1,720kg3,792lb
Gross weight
2,237kg4,932lb
2,370kg5,225lb
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
81.7s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
31.6s
Calculated
29.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,468km912mi
Calculated
658km409mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,496cc91cu in
Length
4,862mm191in
4,755mm187in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,477mm58in
1,494mm59in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,582mm62in
Ground clearance
139mm5in
-
Trunk volume
660L
490L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,510L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200PowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI3,600-4,100 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,350 rpm
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 2005,800-6,100 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.6 s
29.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
154 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
204 hp
152 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 has 4 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,731 kg
3,816 lb
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
1,720 kg
3,792 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
233 km/h
145 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI7.9 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 2007.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,468 km
912 mi
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
658 km
409 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.9 s
233 km/h
145 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
204 hp
152 kW
7.5 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.9 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.5 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,731 kg
3,816 lb
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
Fuel consumption
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Range score
1,468 km
912 mi
658 km
409 mi
Trunk score
660 L
23.3 cu ft
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Consumption4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.23 LC100 km13.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.24 LC100 mi21.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used705 L186 US gal155 UK gal1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,234 LC/year1,995 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 810 km (503 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 170 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 11 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
2.0 TDI
C 220d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0 TDI
2.0d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI
C 200
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI
C 200
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI
C 200
CLA 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200vsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220d
Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI vs Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster