AUDI A6 allroad (C8)
Car comparison
AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 40 TDIvsSkoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,731 kg3,816 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,468 km912 mi
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score90/100
AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 1,731kg3,816lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,237kg4,932lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 81.7s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 969km602mi Calculated | 1,468km912mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,951mm195in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,542mm61in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,925mm115in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | 1,645mm65in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,611mm63in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 184mm7in | 139mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 660L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,680L | 1,950L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 69L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 3,600-4,100 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 40 TDI has 4 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 40 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,731 kg 3,816 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 7.8 s |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 40 TDI and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 40 TDI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 969 km 602 mi |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,468 km 912 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | 1,731 kg 3,816 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 969 km 602 mi | 1,468 km 912 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 40 TDI | Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 allroad (C8) 40 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Is 94 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 499 km (310 mi) more estimated range
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























