Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,468 km912 mi
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Lightest1,541 kg3,397 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,731kg3,816lb | 1,541kg3,397lb |
| Gross weight | 2,237kg4,932lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.7s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 66.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.6s Calculated | 28.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,468km912mi Calculated | 1,146km712mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,639mm183in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,510mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,679mm105in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,548mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 660L | 611L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | 1,624L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 69L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 3,600-4,100 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.6 s | 28.2 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,731 kg 3,816 lb |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,468 km 912 mi |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 1,146 km 712 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.1 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI | VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,731 kg 3,816 lb | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,468 km 912 mi | 1,146 km 712 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | 611 L 21.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 322 km (200 mi) more estimated range
- Has 49 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























