Car comparison

Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSIvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Karoq

1.5 TSI

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2017-2021
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 e-Skyactiv G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    204 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,303 kg
    2,873 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    115 hp/t
    86 kW/t
    8.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    521 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    981 km
    609 mi
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKaroq1.5 TSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
213Nm157lb-ft
Curb weight
1,303kg2,873lb
1,407kg3,102lb
Gross weight
1,915kg4,222lb
1,927kg4,248lb
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
To 99% top speed
79.8s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
77.0s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
66.4s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
926km575mi
Calculated
981km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,498cc91cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,382mm173in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,603mm63in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,638mm104in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,576mm62in
-
Rear track
1,541mm61in
-
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
521L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,630L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
51L
CO2 emissions
123g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSIMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKaroq1.5 TSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
66.4 s
-
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
213 Nm
157 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
1,303 kg
2,873 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1,407 kg
3,102 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
204 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
198 km/h
123 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI8.4 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
926 km
575 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
981 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.4 s
204 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
198 km/h
123 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,382 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,603 mm
63.1 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
8.4 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKaroq1.5 TSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Lightness
1,303 kg
2,873 lb
1,407 kg
3,102 lb
Fuel consumption
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,382 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,603 mm
63.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
926 km
575 mi
981 km
609 mi
CO2 score
123 g/km
-
Trunk score
521 L
18.4 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Karoq 1.5 TSIMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.45 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.21 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used810 L214 US gal178 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,418 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI

  • Has 37 Nm more
  • Is 104 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 91 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 55 km (34 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.5 TSI
35 TFSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsAUDIQ235 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.5 TSI
280TSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1.5 TSI
Cooper D 2.0
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster