Car comparison

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021
VS

Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018

2.0 SKYACTIV-G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Fastest top speed
    204 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    224 Nm
    165 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    86 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    128 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    857 km
    533 mi
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best overall score
    53/100
  • Best performance score
    40/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
180hp134kW
150hp112kW
Torque
224Nm165lb-ft
207Nm153lb-ft
Curb weight
1,556kg3,430lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
1,773kg3,909lb
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
84.0s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
76.9s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.2s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
70.0s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.7s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.7s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
857km533mi
Calculated
629km391mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,275mm168in
Width
1,795mm71in
1,765mm69in
Height
1,540mm61in
1,535mm60in
Wheelbase
2,655mm105in
2,570mm101in
Front track
1,565mm62in
1,523mm60in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,521mm60in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
155mm6in
Trunk volume
430L
350L
Max trunk volume
1,406L
1,260L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
48L
44L
CO2 emissions
128g/km
160g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.7 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.2 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
70.0 s
-
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
14.0 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.7 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
138 km/h
86 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X has 30 hp more than Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
207 Nm
153 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,556 kg
3,430 lb
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X9.2 s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G8.8 s

Although Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X has more power, Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
857 km
533 mi
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
629 km
391 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
9.2 s
204 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
9.2 s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
180 hp
134 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
207 Nm
153 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.2 s
8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,556 kg
3,430 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Range score
857 km
533 mi
629 km
391 mi
CO2 score
128 g/km
160 g/km
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Consumption5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.80 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.77 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used840 L222 US gal185 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,470 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 17 Nm more
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 229 km (142 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 32 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

  • Is 246 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Mazda CX-3 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0 Skyactiv-X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 Skyactiv-X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 Skyactiv-X
20d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 D4
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
200
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsLexusUX200
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
GLA 200
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X vs Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G - car comparison - FastVsFaster